Current:Home > reviewsLiberal Wisconsin Supreme Court justice rejects GOP call to recuse on redistricting cases-LoTradeCoin
Liberal Wisconsin Supreme Court justice rejects GOP call to recuse on redistricting cases
View Date:2025-01-18 17:05:26
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A newly elected liberal Wisconsin Supreme Court justice, who has called Republican-drawn electoral districts “rigged,” declined to recuse herself on Friday from a pair of redistricting lawsuits.
Justice Janet Protasiewicz’s decision to remain on the cases increases the chance that Republicans, who control the Legislature and drew the maps, may proceed with the unprecedented step of impeaching her. Assembly Speaker Robin Vos has threatened impeachment if she doesn’t step down.
Vos had no immediate comment on her decision, saying he needed to first speak with his attorney.
Republicans argue she has pre-judged the cases, which could result in new, more Democrat-friendly maps being drawn before the 2024 election.
The Wisconsin Judicial Commission, which investigates complaints against judges, earlier this year rejected complaints filed against Protasiewicz related to her comments on redistricting during the campaign.
Two lawsuits challenging the latest maps were filed in the first week after Protasiewicz joined the Supreme Court on Aug. 1. Protasiewicz is part of a 4-3 liberal majority on the court, ending a 15-year run with conservative justices in control.
Republicans asked that Protasiewicz recuse from both redistricting cases, arguing in their motion that “Justice Protasiewicz’s campaign statements reveal that her thumb is very much on the scale in this case.” They also pointed to the nearly $10 million she received from the Wisconsin Democratic Party, which is not a party on the redistricting cases but has advocated for drawing new maps.
During her winning campaign, Protasiewicz called the Republican-drawn maps “unfair” and “rigged” and said there needs to be “a fresh look at the gerrymandering question.” Protasiewicz never said how she would rule on a redistricting lawsuit.
“Recusal decisions are controlled by the law,” Protasiewicz wrote. “They are not a matter of personal preference. If precedent requires it, I must recuse. But if precedent does not warrant recusal, my oath binds me to participate.”
Protasiewicz said that is the case even if the case is controversial.
“Respect for the law must always prevail,” she wrote. “Allowing politics or pressure to sway my decision would betray my oath and destroy judicial independence.”
Attorneys who brought the lawsuits argued that there was no legal or ethical obligation for Protasiewicz to step aside. They also point to the Wisconsin Judicial Commission rejecting complaints against her related to her comments during the campaign about redistricting.
The legislative electoral maps drawn by the Republican-controlled Legislature in 2011 cemented the party’s majorities, which now stand at 65-34 in the Assembly and a 22-11 supermajority in the Senate. Republicans adopted maps last year that were similar to the existing ones.
Wisconsin’s Assembly districts rank among the most gerrymandered nationally, with Republicans routinely winning far more seats than would be expected based on their average share of the vote, according to an Associated Press analysis.
Both lawsuits ask that all 132 state lawmakers be up for election in newly drawn districts. In Senate districts that are midway through a four-year term in 2024, there would be a special election, with the winners serving two years. The regular four-year cycle would resume again in 2026.
One lawsuit was filed on behalf of voters who support Democrats by the Stafford Rosenbaum law firm, Election Law Clinic at Harvard Law School, Campaign Legal Center, the Arnold & Porter law firm and Law Forward, a Madison-based liberal law firm.
The other case was brought by voters who support Democratic candidates and several members of the Citizen Mathematicians and Scientists. That group of professors and research scientists submitted proposed legislative maps in 2022, before the state Supreme Court adopted the Republican-drawn ones.
veryGood! (43)
Related
- Cruise ship rescues 4 from disabled catamaran hundreds of miles off Bermuda, officials say
- Utah citizen initiatives at stake as judge weighs keeping major changes off ballots
- Abortions are down under Florida’s 6-week ban but not by as much as in other states, study says
- A Colorado man is charged with arson in a wildfire that destroyed 26 homes
- Hill House Home’s Once-A-Year Sale Is Here: Get 30% off Everything & up to 75% off Luxury Dresses
- CLIMATE GLIMPSE: Wildfires plague U.S. West and Brazil, Yagi rampages in Vietnam
- Reggie Bush was at his LA-area home when 3 male suspects attempted to break in
- Tyreek Hill says he could have handled his traffic stop better but he still wants the officer fired
- US Congress hopes to 'pull back the curtain' on UFOs in latest hearing: How to watch
- Inflation eases to three-year low in August. How will it affect Fed rate cuts?
Ranking
- Sister Wives’ Janelle Brown Alleges Ex Kody Made False Claims About Family’s Finances
- Where is 'College GameDay' for Week 3? Location, what to know for ESPN show
- The echoes of Colin Kaepernick ring loudly in Tyreek Hill police detainment
- 2024 MTV VMAs: Eminem Proves He’s Still the Real Slim Shady With Rousing Opening Performance
- She's a trans actress and 'a warrior.' Now, this 'Emilia Pérez' star could make history.
- 2024 MTV VMAs: Chanel West Coast Drops Jaws in Nipple Dress
- Could America’s divide on marijuana be coming to an end?
- Travis Kelce admits watching football while at US Open on 'New Heights' podcast
Recommendation
-
Messi breaks silence on Inter Miami's playoff exit. What's next for his time in the US?
-
Democrats claiming Florida Senate seat is in play haven’t put money behind the effort to make it so
-
Truth Social parent company shares close at record low after Trump-Harris debate
-
Man charged with drugging, raping women he met through ‘sugar daddy’ website
-
Jelly Roll goes to jail (for the best reason) ahead of Indianapolis concert
-
Court won’t allow public money to be spent on private schools in South Carolina
-
Harris and Trump are jockeying for battleground states after their debate faceoff
-
An Ohio city reshaped by Haitian immigrants lands in an unwelcome spotlight