Current:Home > NewsCan my employer use my photos to promote its website without my permission? Ask HR-LoTradeCoin
Can my employer use my photos to promote its website without my permission? Ask HR
View Date:2025-01-18 13:17:19
Johnny C. Taylor Jr. tackles your human resources questions as part of a series for USA TODAY. Taylor is president and CEO of the Society for Human Resource Management, the world's largest HR professional society and author of "Reset: A Leader’s Guide to Work in an Age of Upheaval.”
Have a question? Submit it here.
Question: My employer has utilized some of my photos on their social media and website to promote their business. I was never notified or asked for permission. Should they be allowed to use my images without my permission and compensation? – Marvin
Answer: Your employer may be able to use the images found on your social media platforms. In the age of Facebook, Instagram and X, formerly Twitter, it’s a common practice for individuals and organizations to repost others’ photographs and images. Unfortunately, laws have not kept up with our social media era and the ability to share, remix, or modify online content.
No federal law prohibits an employer from using an employee’s photo for business purposes. However, many states have statutes commonly known as “right-of-publicity” or “right-of-privacy” laws. In some states, they may be addressed as “unfair competition” or “personality rights.” These state laws prevent using an individual’s name, image, voice, photo, or “likeness” for commercial purposes without prior consent from the individual. I recommend you review your state laws to see if the use of your social media photos falls under its statutes.
Social media platforms are not considered public domain, and the use of your photos could also be limited by copyright laws or the platform’s terms and conditions. Even under a platform’s terms and conditions, it likely cannot stop your employer from using or reposting your photos. Copyright laws protect the photographer and will likely not apply to photos you appear in unless they are selfies.
Legal remedies aren’t always the most prudent or practical solution to disputes between two parties – in this case, you and your employer. Indeed, if you have a problem with your employer using your photos, you can always let them know. They should be willing to respond to a respectful and reasonable request. If you are concerned that it may be a thorny or contentious issue, you should probably start by speaking with your HR team. I hope you find an amicable agreement with your employer to protect your privacy.
Performance reviewIs there any recourse for a poor job review with no prior feedback? Ask HR
I was let go from my last job because I could not see well enough at night to drive safely. My job was from 8 a.m. to 4:40 p.m. most days. Everyone in my department was expected to be available to work at night if called upon. I informed the company during my interview that I could not see to drive at night. They could not find any fault with my work, so they used my inability to drive at night as cause for my termination. Is this a case of discrimination? – Powell”
Answer: Losing a job is never easy, and it can be incredibly disheartening when you feel as though you were performing well and the termination was unjustified. To answer your question, it could be a case of discrimination, but it will depend on the facts and circumstances.
Under The Americans with Disabilities Act, employers with 15 or more employees must engage candidates and employees in an interactive process to determine if they are “qualified individuals,” meaning “an individual who, with or without reasonable accommodation, can perform the essential functions of the employment position that such individual holds or desires.” This means that if driving at night was an essential function of your job, you may not be eligible for an accommodation, and they could terminate you.
Suppose your former employer is subject to ADA regulations. In this case, they should have used the information you provided about driving at night as a catalyst for going through the interactive process to identify if you were eligible for a reasonable accommodation. For example, if night driving occurs just three or four times per year, maybe a reasonable accommodation would be for your company to provide you with an Uber or Lyft on those rare occasions when they need you to work until dark.
Determining whether a reasonable accommodation exists would likely include obtaining medical documentation from you or your physician. There are some cases when a specific accommodation may not be suitable due to cost or the impact on the workforce, but your company (not you) bears the burden of proving an accommodation is a burden.
You may want to contact your Human Resources department for additional information and to see if the ADA applies to your previous employer. If you feel your employer missed steps, consider speaking to legal counsel or your local Department of Labor for additional insight.
Drug testingShould I get paid for time spend getting a test? Ask HR
veryGood! (72485)
Related
- US Congress hopes to 'pull back the curtain' on UFOs in latest hearing: How to watch
- Duane Keith Davis, charged with murder in Tupac Shakur's 1996 death, pleads not guilty in Las Vegas
- Indiana high court reprimands AG for remarks about 10-year-old rape victim's doctor
- I spent two hours floating naked in a dark chamber for my mental health. Did it work?
- Rafael dissolves into a low pressure system in the Gulf of Mexico after hitting Cuba as a hurricane
- Rwanda announces visa-free travel for all Africans as continent opens up to free movement of people
- Millions of dollars of psychedelic mushrooms seized in a Connecticut bust
- NFL Week 9 picks: Will Dolphins or Chiefs triumph in battle of AFC's best?
- PSA: Coach Outlet Has Stocking Stuffers, Gifts Under $100 & More for the Holidays RN (up to 60% Off)
- Pac-12 showdown and SEC clashes: The 7 biggest games of Week 10 in college football
Ranking
- Climate Advocacy Groups Say They’re Ready for Trump 2.0
- A small plane headed from Croatia to Salzburg crashes in Austria, killing 4 people
- FTC Chair Lina Khan on Antitrust in the age of Amazon
- Blinken, Austin urge Congress to pass funding to support both Israel and Ukraine
- How Saturday Night Live Reacted to Donald Trump’s Win Over Kamala Harris
- Puerto Rican ex-boxer Félix Verdejo sentenced to life in prison in the killing of his pregnant lover
- Toxic Pesticides Are Sprayed Next to Thousands of US Schools
- Deep Rifts at UN Loss and Damage Talks Cast a Shadow on Upcoming Climate Conference
Recommendation
-
School workers accused of giving special needs student with digestive issue hot Takis, other abuse
-
Head of China’s state-backed Catholic church to visit Hong Kong amid strained Sino-Vatican relations
-
Prosecutor questions Florida dentist’s claim he was extorted, not a murder-for-hire mastermind
-
Businessman sentenced in $180 million bank fraud that paid for lavish lifestyle, classic cars
-
Champions Classic is for elite teams. So why is Michigan State still here? | Opinion
-
Joro spiders, huge and invasive, spreading around eastern US, study finds
-
Job growth slowed last month, partly over the impact of the UAW strikes
-
Can Trump be on the ballot in 2024? It can hinge on the meaning of ‘insurrection’
Like
- 'Serial swatter': 18-year-old pleads guilty to making nearly 400 bomb threats, mass shooting calls
- Justice Department launches civil rights probes into South Carolina jails after at least 14 inmate deaths
- German club Mainz terminates Anwar El Ghazi’s contract over social media posts on Israel-Hamas war